Genetics, Mode of Inheritance and Genetic Counseling
Hugo W Moser, M.D. Ann B Moser, B.A. Steven J Steinberg, Ph.D. and Stephan
Kemp Ph.D.
Identification of the ABCD1 gene
Genetic linkage with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) pointed the
X-ALD locus to the extremity of the long arm of the X-chromosome, Xq28 .(1).
In 1993, the X-ALD gene (ABCD1) was identified using positional
cloning strategies (2). The ABCD1 gene is approximately
20 kb long and contains ten exons (3). It came as a surprise
that its protein product, ALDP, is not an very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase
(VLCS: is the protein that was anticipated to be the cause of X-ALD).
Based on sequence homology ALDP belongs to a different family of proteins,
the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily of transmembrane transporter proteins
(4). ALDP consists of 745 amino acids and contains a membrane
domain with six transmembrane segments in the amino-half and an ATP-binding
domain in the carboxy-half of the protein. Immunocytochemical studies demonstrated
that ALDP is a peroxisomal membrane protein, which is in agreement with the
observed biochemical abnormality in X-ALD patients (deficient peroxisomal beta-oxidation
of saturated very long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA) 5, 6,
7).
Confirmation the defects in ABCD1 cause X-ALD
Evidence that the gene identified by positional cloning is indeed the gene
responsible for X-ALD came initially from identification of mutations in the
ABCD1 gene (2). Mutations have been found in all X-ALD
patients thoroughly examined. Complementation studies in fibroblasts derived
from X-ALD patients demonstrated that expression of normal ABCD1 gene
in patient cells restores VLCFA metabolism. This confirmed that ABCD1
and not VLCS is the gene responsible for X-ALD ( 8,
9, 10). Furthermore, stable expression of
ABCD1 cDNA in X-ALD fibroblasts corrects VLCFA levels to normal levels
(9).
The function of ALDP and its role in relation to either VLCFA metabolism
and/or VLCS activity remains to be unveiled. Based on its similarity with transport
proteins it is assumed that ALDP is a transporter. However, the transport function
has not yet been demonstrated and its potential substrate remains unidentified.
Immunocytochemical studies have shown that in 70% of all X-ALD patients ALDP
cannot be detected by immunoassay (7, 11,
12). All mutations other than missense mutations disrupt the
stability of ALDP.
Genotype-phenotype correlation and Genetic counseling
X-ALD is inherited in an X-linked recessive manner. The ABCD1 gene
is the only gene associated with X-ALD.
All daughters of an affected male are carriers; none of his sons will be affected.
A female who is a carrier has a 50% chance of transmitting the ABCD1
mutation with each pregnancy. Sons who inherit the mutation will be affected;
daughters who inherit the mutation are carriers and will usually not be seriously
affected. Many individuals with X-ALD remain asymptomatic until middle age or
even later.
The range of phenotypic expression in X-ALD and the prognosis of an affected
male is unpredictably variable and can NOT be predicted through levels of VLCFA
in plasma or cultured skin fibroblasts (13, 15),
the residual VLCFA beta-oxidation activity present in X-ALD skin fibroblasts
(14), the family history or the nature of the mutation identified
in the ABCD1 gene of the patient. The same mutation can be associated
with each of the known clinical phenotypes. Mild phenotypes may be associated
with large deletions that abolish formation of the gene product, and severe
phenotypes occur with missense mutations in which normal amounts of ALDP protein
is produced. Widely varying clinical phenotypes often co-occur in a single kindred
or sibship. The most common ABCD1 mutation, a two base pair deletion
in exon 5 found in approximately 10% of X-ALD families, has been associated
with all X-ALD phenotypes (16, 17). The
group from Dr. Johannes Berger has identified a family in which six affected
members had five different phenotypes (18).
Segregation analysis suggests that the phenotypic variability is due to an
autosomal modifier gene (19, 20). However,
unidentified environmental factors may also be involved, as indicated by phenotypic
variability in a set of monozygotic twins (21).
It is important for couples at risk to be aware
that widely varying phenotypes often coexist in the same kindred or sibship.
Thus, families that have experienced the relatively mild phenotypes need to
be advised that affected offspring may display the severe phenotype.
Mode of inheritance
Parents of a male or female proband:
About 93% of index cases have inherited the ABCD1 mutation from one
parent; at most, 7% of individuals with X-ALD have de novo mutations.
It is appropriate to measure plasma VLCFA concentration in the mothers of both
affected males and carrier females and in the fathers of carrier females. When
the disease-causing mutation has been identified in an affected family member,
mutation analysis of the ABCD1 gene can be used in the evaluation of
the parents.
Sibs of a proband:
The risk to sibs depends upon the genetic status of the parents, which can be
clarified by pedigree analysis, VLCFA measurement, and molecular genetic testing.
If the proband's mother is a carrier, the chance of transmitting the disease-causing
mutation in each pregnancy is 50%. Male sibs who inherit the mutation will be
affected; female sibs who inherit the mutation will be carriers.
If the proband's father has a disease-causing mutation in the ABCD1 gene, all
of the female sibs will be carriers and none of the male sibs will be affected.
If neither parent is a carrier, the risk to sibs of a proband is low.
Offspring of a proband:
Affected males transmit the ABCD1 mutation to all of their daughters and none of their sons.
Carrier females have a 50% chance of transmitting the ABCD1 mutation in each pregnancy. Sons who inherit the mutation
will be affected; daughters who inherit the mutation are carriers and will usually not be seriously affected.
Other family members of a proband:
Depending upon their gender, family relationship, and the carrier status of
the proband's parents, the proband's aunts and uncles and their offspring may
be at risk of being carriers or of being affected.
Evaluation of at-risk family members is important for
management and genetic counseling but is often implemented insufficiently. Several
factors may contribute to insufficient evaluation:
Establishing the diagnosis in an affected individual with severe disability
may be devastating to a family. Immediate concerns may overshadow the timely
testing of family members.
Molecular genetic testing has been clinically available for a short time;
but its availability may not yet be generally known.
Insurance companies may not cover the cost of testing at-risk family
members.
Some at-risk family members may choose not to be tested because they fear
that a positive result might impair their ability to obtain or retain medical
insurance coverage.
Individuals may have incomplete knowledge about at-risk family members
and may not wish to inform them about the risk.
Prevalence of X-ALD
The prevalence is estimated to be between 1:20,000 and 1:50,000, and appears
to be approximately the same in all ethnic groups. The minimum frequency of
hemizygotes identified in the United States is estimated to be 1:21,000 and
that of hemizygotes plus heterozygotes 1:16,800. (22)
H.W. Moser, K.D. Smith, P.A. Watkins, J. Powers, A.B. Moser
(2001) X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. In 'The Metabolic Basis of Inherited
Disease 7th edn (eds Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS and Valle D) 3257-3301
(McGraw Hill, New York).